A Savings Number Is Only as Useful as the Assumptions Behind It.
Use a disciplined chain from inputs and assumptions through calculation, economics, context, and decision.
Framework
-
Inputs
-
Assumptions
-
Calculation
-
Economics
-
Context
-
Decision
Name the Number for What It Actually Measures.
Use precise terminology.
- Annual kWh Reduction
- Annual Energy Cost Reduction
- Project Cost
- Potential / User Entered Incentive
- Net Project Investment
- Simple Payback
Baseline and Evidence
Baseline
The existing condition must be described well enough to support the calculation.
Evidence
Distinguish Observed, Customer Provided, Documented, Assumed, Estimated, and Verified information.
kWh vs Dollars
Energy reduction and energy-cost reduction are different quantities.
- Annual kWh Reduction
A quantity of energy.
- Annual Energy Cost Reduction
A quantity of money.
Connected Load and Hours
Fixture count, system wattage, and annual operating hours drive the basic lighting-energy model.
Annual lighting energy is fixture count multiplied by system wattage multiplied by annual operating hours.
Electricity Rate
The calculator uses the applicable rate you enter.
Project Cost and Incentive
Net project investment equals project cost minus the incentive you enter.
Simple Payback
Simple payback equals net project investment divided by annual energy cost reduction, when the approved edge conditions are satisfied.
Calculated only when the approved edge conditions are satisfied.
What Payback Does Not Tell You
Simple payback does not by itself model any of the following, or every capital consideration.
- Financing
- Discount rates
- Escalation
- Taxes
- Lifecycle replacement
- Demand charges
- Maintenance
- Controls
- HVAC interaction
- Carbon
Precision About What Is Being Measured
ROI Is Distinct
ROI is not interchangeable with simple payback. A payback calculation is not labelled as ROI.
Cash Flow and First-Year ROI
Used only when specifically defined with appropriate inputs. They are not inferred from the basic calculator.
Other Savings Categories
Demand, maintenance, controls, HVAC interaction, carbon, financing, and lifecycle economics require separate evidence and methodology if used.
Reference Calculator Scenario
A worked example, shown so the arithmetic is inspectable. These are illustrative inputs, not a result for any building.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Inputs | |
| Fixture count | 100 |
| Existing wattage | 100 W per fixture |
| Proposed wattage | 50 W per fixture |
| Hours per day | 10 |
| Days per week | 5 |
| Weeks per year | 52 |
| Electricity rate | $0.10 per kWh |
| Project cost | $10,000 |
| Incentive entered | $2,000 |
| Results | |
| Annual operating hours | 2,600 |
| Connected load | 10 kW existing / 5 kW proposed |
| Annual energy | 26,000 kWh existing / 13,000 kWh proposed |
| Annual kWh reduction | 13,000 kWh |
| Reduction | 50% |
| Annual energy cost reduction | $1,300 |
| Net project investment | $8,000 |
| Simple payback | About 6.15 years |
Sensitivity
Changing any of these can materially change the result.
- Runtime
- Rate
- Wattage
- Project cost
- Incentive
Estimate vs Verification
Decision View
Place the calculation inside the broader building decision.
-
Existing
-
Proposed
-
Impact
-
Decision
Portfolio Context
Comparable assumptions can support portfolio prioritization, but building differences remain important.
Questions Before Relying on the Number
-
What is the baseline?
-
What is measured?
-
What is assumed?
-
What is the runtime source?
-
What rate is used?
-
What project cost is included?
-
Is the incentive potential or approved?
-
What savings categories are excluded?
-
What evidence supports the wattages?
-
Are controls separate?
-
Is the result estimated or verified?
-
What decision is the number intended to support?
How to Use This Guide
This is educational guidance. It is not financial, tax, investment, accounting, or legal advice. It contains no hidden savings, no default utility rate, no square-foot shortcut, and no generic reduction percentage.